by Jane Douglas
I was eight years old when I first met Edgar Allan Poe. For several weeks, each afternoon, my fourth grade teacher Miss Gough would gather her class around her feet like a brood of hungry chicks and read to us from Poe’s short stories. I can remember how excitedly we waited for story time, how even the wriggly kids hung on every word. The feeling of horror as the super-creepy ending of The Black Cat was revealed has never left me.
This past week, ahead of Penumbra’s Poe episode, reading Poe again, my first thought was, “What on earth can Miss Gough have been thinking?” Some of those are pretty scary stories. Perhaps she realized that Poe’s plots were no worse than the urban myths we kids would whisper in the dark during slumber parties, driving ourselves to fits of delicious, sleepless terror. Still, I doubt Poe would get a mention in fourth grade classes today. I imagine over-protective moms and school psychologists fearing emotional scarring would see to that.
Even though Poe’s stories are in some ways quite dated, for me, they still stir up sufficient plausible emotion that I can enjoy them as a toe-curling read. That surprised me, so I’ve given some thought to what it might be that gives Poe’s short stories such evocative power, even to me, a 21st century reader who likes to think she hasn’t a superstitious bone in her body. I should also say that I could count the works of horror fiction I’ve read on half a hand; I’ve tried to make a respectable list but after noting John Wyndham’s Jizzle, Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, and Conan Doyle’s Hound of the Baskervilles, I ran out of puff. So, if you don’t mind, this article will be an honest appraisal from a virtual horror noob. With any luck, the result will bob to the surface fresh and perhaps even insightful, and not simply drown in a sad bucket of ignorance. Perhaps my observations of what works for me – and what doesn’t – might prove useful to some author somewhere. So here goes...
A lot of Poe’s short stories are written as first person narratives, and the narrator is always male. The plot unfolds as though it is being told, often conversationally, to the reader sometime after the events. Although we know from the start that the narrator survives his impending ordeal – here he is telling us about it – somehow that doesn’t detract from the power of being drawn through the narrative in a very personal way; we never stop wondering what will happen next. Because no omniscient narrator stands between the reader and the main character, we experience the action with him; Poe’s evocative writing has us imagining ourselves in his place. There is a grittiness about this style of narrative that reminds me of old detective novels, and indeed Poe’s The Murders in the Rue Morgue is often credited as the first in the genre. Poe’s narrators are portrayed as ordinary men who find themselves involved in something extraordinary. This connection with a recognizable everyman provides the narrative believability; we can hear the voice of the person at the centre, which makes our access to his inner dialogue and emotions seem perfectly natural. We feel what the narrator feels, as he feels it. I like that.
Poe often leaps into the story with a start. The Tell-Tale Heart begins,
“TRUE! – nervous – very, very dreadfully nervous I had been and am; but why will you say that I am mad?”
as though the two of us have been conversing for some time already and we have just got to the good bit. It’s effective, and throws us into the plot with little time to catch our breath. Other times Poe addresses us more formally, and we feel we are reading a diary or journal account of the tale. Either way, Poe causes us as readers to quickly feel we are present in the action; and that is no mean feat.
Readers are sucked into Poe’s vortex of horror with what seems to be very little effort. Although his narrators often begin with protestations of rationality, they are all prone to attacks of superstitious jitters given spooky surroundings, and weird happenings. Often they admit repeatedly that their fears are baseless – and all of the circumstances related can be explained by coincidence or natural phenomena – yet they are not able to throw off an abiding feeling of dread. Poe’s skillful manipulation of common human fears, in reality, leads his readers into a shared attack of the heebie-jeebies, which, strangely, is compounded by the narrator’s pooh-poohing of his imaginings. Although the stories are macabre, they seem familiar. Who hasn’t got the willies jumping at shadows alone in some dark and spidery place? As Poe’s protagonist describes a growing and inexplicably visceral fear, we empathise with his crumbling mental faculties, and his incapacity to assert his reason to reverse the process. To experience terror at the imagined horrors of the unknown is a very human response.
Poe’s timing is near-perfect. He seems to have an uncanny sense of just how long he ought to string the reader along with creepy details and descriptions of inner cogitations before giving us something real to worry about. It’s as though Poe is aware that the more nervous the reader becomes, the faster they scan the text. As suspense mounts, often Poe produces long passages of description that the reader rushes through, eyes darting from one object to another in growing panic. He stretches those moments out just long enough to torment the readers’ nerves without irritating them to a point of unpleasantness. I imagine him slowing his emotional responses down so that they keep step as he handwrites the passage to suit the heightened emotions of his future reader. However he achieved it, Poe certainly had the knack. I was never bored, but always held at just the right level of tingliness in each moment.
One of Poe’s greatest talents is in employing evocative language to involve the senses of the reader; he makes us feel as present in the events of the story as any writer I know. A great deal of this sensual imagery is visual. Take this description from The Fall of the House of Usher:
“...the carvings of the ceilings, the sombre tapestries of the walls, the ebon blackness of the floors, and the phantasmagoric armorial trophies which rattled as I strode....”
Poe paints a picture of Gothic gloom, and although the rattling armour seems a cliche to the contemporary reader, in the context of the story, and even with the narrator smacking down his superstitious mental wanderings, it has an undeniably creepy effect. Decaying, dilapidated settings speak of the wrongness of the place; light and cheer are always absent as the material environment reflects the horror of the tale. In The Pit and the Pendulum, the story begins with the narrator regaining consciousness in a space filled with impenetrable darkness and Poe evokes feelings of dread through descriptions that involve senses other than sight. The pit emits a “clammy vapour, and the peculiar smell of decayed fungus”; the stone walls are “smooth, slimy and cold”, the ground “moist and slippery”; we hear with the protagonist the tiny skitterings of the feet of approaching rats. These sensual descriptions are detailed, believable and never dull.
A truly great aspect of Poe’s horror stories is that every circumstance can be explained away without resorting to supernatural influence or the presence of mythical beasties. In The Black Cat, the arrival of a feline of very similar appearance to the narrator’s formerly tortured pet can easily be explained by co-incidence. Even the growth of white hairs in the shape of a gallows on the cat’s chest would attract little comment without the gin-addled, guilt-stricken mind of the narrator attaching meaning to it. Poe allows us to experience the prickle of fear such coincidences provoke, and then stands back while they lead us away to awful imaginings he never enunciates directly. A peculiar gentleman who mutter to himself in “gutteral tones” excites the universal dread of the insane; the ravages of alcohol abuse we know will lead to perverse and cruel acts against innocents; the dreadful consequences that follow those acts we imagine are a supernatural retribution; the horrible deaths in Murders in the Rue Morgue seem to have been perpetrated by a super-human, who turns out to be a cranky, knife-wielding orangutan. But these natural revelations are never a let down. Readers play along, aware of Poe’s sleight of hand, but allowing our own imaginations to become part of the story, our suspicions tools that Poe wields to develop terrors in our minds instead of plainly on the page.
But not every feature of Poe’s stories is as effective for the contemporary reader as it may have been for readers in the mid-19th century. We no longer believe that a person’s physiognomy unfailingly reveals their mental, emotional and moral state. Modern medicine has removed the dread of infection and fever; a “ghastly pallor of the skin” and “peculiar lustre of the eye” are unlikely to be viewed as harbingers of death, but as easily fixed with a Tylenol and a wee lie down. Unkempt hair and clothing no longer speaks of madness, drunkenness, or other morally questionable states. Thanks to 1940s cinema, depictions of an insane character ‘improvising mad dirges’ on an organ strike us as laughable, as does the frequent swoonings of the narrator in The Pit and the Pendulum (did people ever really faint away with fright?).
Poe’s original audiences would likely have been mostly Christian and this is apparent in his use of metaphors and imagery that would have caused his religious readers to worry at things that we do not. It is likely that they would have, for example, found it believable that the Usher household suffered from a “constitutional and family evil”. Poe’s descriptions in The Fall of the House of Usher of a “sulphureous lustre [which] lay over all” evokes well-known literary visions of hell, then believed to be a real and very much feared destination for the damned. It’s an oversimplification, but it is possible that in The Black Cat Poe’s early readers would have seen the narrator’s banging on the wall inside which he had interred his wife and so giving away his dread secret as a fair example of pride coming before a fall. Indeed, Christian morals abound in Poe’s writings once you start looking.
But those “flaws” notwithstanding Poe’s stories have endured because they are simply what we in Australia would call “bloody good yarns”. Poe spins us tales that trick, torment and ¬– even today – retain a power to shock, and better, surprise us just a little. Firmly rooted in a reality of sorts, and without the lashings of graphic gore upon which some contemporary authors rely, Poe draws us in, frightens us, and sends us on our way wondering how it was he managed to achieve that end with such simple devices. After reading them again, I was left with the firm impression that Poe’s stories contain many lessons from which modern horror writers could learn. Write me a contemporary version of The Black Cat and I’ll be happy to add it to my shelf.
Jane Douglas is a freelance writer, student and intern with Penumbra EMag. She lives with a tribe of children and way too many animals in Queensland, Australia.
Thursday, 4 October 2012
Tuesday, 2 October 2012
First Anniversary Greetings from the Editor in Chief
by Celina Summers
Penumbra is one year old today.
How bizarre is that? A year ago, we pushed our first issue out on a raft made of bamboo into the hurricane that is publishing, and the darn thing didn't sink! In fact, that raft is still going, gradually strengthening along with the changes and additions we've made to the magazine, and now we have hundreds of you on board as well.
That definitely makes the journey more pleasant, as it should. When a magazine gains an audience, a dedicated readership, it's much easier to determine what types of stories they like.
So to me it only seems fair that you, the Penumbra reader, gets to toss us your two cents' worth on this, our first anniversary. If you could take a minute to answer the poll we've posted on this page, it will assist us as we continue to build Penumbra into the type of speculative fiction magazine that you want to read.
It is our greatest hope as we continue our mission to meet the needs of the readers who have been stranded after the demise of some of our long-time favorite sf/f magazines. We want to continue to grow and develop with our readership—a readership that multiplied swiftly after we offered to fulfill the contracts with the Realms of Fantasy subscribers. After we assumed those subscriptions, everything at Penumbra suddenly seemed more real…more pertinent.
With today's release of our Edgar Allan Poe issue, we've come to the next step for Penumbra. We will seek recognition from Science Fiction and Fantasy Writers of America and other spec fic organizations. We will strive to publish stories both from familiar names and debut authors. We will seek additional markets, reviewers, and awards recognition for our authors and their stories. We will continue to offer industry master classes to the authors, staff, and interns of Penumbra and its parent company, Musa Publishing, in the hopes of better equipping writers for careers as professional writers.
But above all, we will continue to offer you, the reader, the best examples of short fiction possible in every issue.
As an editor, I have to tell you that this year has been an absolute pleasure for me. I've enjoyed reading every submission, every story. I've been honored to work with a pair of amazing columnists, Lori Basiewicz and Richard C. White, who I think are among the best spec fic columnists out there right now. And then our staff: Alisha, who does layout and design; Brandie, who keeps me running on time; Dianna, who started with us at seventeen, continues to do a grown-up job at her internship; Sarah, who's not only the first set of eyes on Penumbra submissions but also does our monthly book reviews; Jane and Jude, our newly arrived interns; Cory, who has worked with me from the beginning to create the internal aesthetic and catch all those pesky comma mistakes; and, of course, my partner in crime Kelly Shorten, who creates the most visually stunning covers I've ever seen for a digital-only magazine.
Thank you for being a part of the Penumbra experience. We look forward to seeing you every month, right here, with a new issue for you to enjoy.
Penumbra is one year old today.
How bizarre is that? A year ago, we pushed our first issue out on a raft made of bamboo into the hurricane that is publishing, and the darn thing didn't sink! In fact, that raft is still going, gradually strengthening along with the changes and additions we've made to the magazine, and now we have hundreds of you on board as well.
That definitely makes the journey more pleasant, as it should. When a magazine gains an audience, a dedicated readership, it's much easier to determine what types of stories they like.
So to me it only seems fair that you, the Penumbra reader, gets to toss us your two cents' worth on this, our first anniversary. If you could take a minute to answer the poll we've posted on this page, it will assist us as we continue to build Penumbra into the type of speculative fiction magazine that you want to read.
It is our greatest hope as we continue our mission to meet the needs of the readers who have been stranded after the demise of some of our long-time favorite sf/f magazines. We want to continue to grow and develop with our readership—a readership that multiplied swiftly after we offered to fulfill the contracts with the Realms of Fantasy subscribers. After we assumed those subscriptions, everything at Penumbra suddenly seemed more real…more pertinent.
With today's release of our Edgar Allan Poe issue, we've come to the next step for Penumbra. We will seek recognition from Science Fiction and Fantasy Writers of America and other spec fic organizations. We will strive to publish stories both from familiar names and debut authors. We will seek additional markets, reviewers, and awards recognition for our authors and their stories. We will continue to offer industry master classes to the authors, staff, and interns of Penumbra and its parent company, Musa Publishing, in the hopes of better equipping writers for careers as professional writers.
But above all, we will continue to offer you, the reader, the best examples of short fiction possible in every issue.
As an editor, I have to tell you that this year has been an absolute pleasure for me. I've enjoyed reading every submission, every story. I've been honored to work with a pair of amazing columnists, Lori Basiewicz and Richard C. White, who I think are among the best spec fic columnists out there right now. And then our staff: Alisha, who does layout and design; Brandie, who keeps me running on time; Dianna, who started with us at seventeen, continues to do a grown-up job at her internship; Sarah, who's not only the first set of eyes on Penumbra submissions but also does our monthly book reviews; Jane and Jude, our newly arrived interns; Cory, who has worked with me from the beginning to create the internal aesthetic and catch all those pesky comma mistakes; and, of course, my partner in crime Kelly Shorten, who creates the most visually stunning covers I've ever seen for a digital-only magazine.
Thank you for being a part of the Penumbra experience. We look forward to seeing you every month, right here, with a new issue for you to enjoy.
Sunday, 30 September 2012
Penumbra turns 1
WELCOME to the MUSA Anniversary Blog hop stop for
Penumbra eMag the Spec Fic e-magazine
Not only is Musa Publishing turning one but so is Penumbra. And with a year of Spec fiction stories out their from issues on Shakepeare, Steampunk, Animals and Politics we still get asked what is Spec fic?Not only can you find Penumbra at Musa Publishing but also at Magzter. So if you are looking for great short stories at a better price check out Penumbra.
"Believe it or not, the question I most often get from spec fic writers is, “What exactly is spec fic?” Someone sends me a manuscript, I accept it, and then a few weeks later they write me and say, in a cyber-whisper, “By the way, I was just wondering…” or “You know, a friend at work asked me the other day …” or “I’m really embarrassed to even ask this question …”
Don’t be embarrassed. Most of us grew up thinking in terms of two related genres—science-fiction and fantasy. I say related, but maybe what I mean is “inexplicably in the same section of the bookstore.” Fantasy and sci-fi tended to get lumped together, even though they were very different. Orson Scott Card once wrote that science fiction has rivets and fantasy has trees. That’s a fun over-simplification, and there’s some truth to it. Really though, most people who read traditional sci-fi fans steer clear of traditional fantasy, and vice versa. The thing that bound the two genres together—at least in the minds of booksellers—was that both were fantastical.
The question in recent years has become, what do you do with books about fantastical subjects that don’t qualify as either sci-fi or as fantasy? For example, there was a disastrous attempt several decades ago to market George Orwell’s 1984 as science fiction. It might have some science fiction elements, but it’s definitely not the sort of thing most traditional sci-fi fans recognize as sci-fi. It is dystopian fiction, similar to Orwell’s other masterpiece Animal Farm, and Robert Hugh Benson’s Lord of the World.
And what about the works of Charles Williams? Difficult to classify. Tarot cards that come to life; Platonic forms that roam the earth; Hell as a plane of existence that co-exists alongside our own. Sometimes you find Williams in the fantasy section, but that’s too easy. His books are not genre fiction; they are meaty and philosophical and full of deep theological themes.
So, what do we do with all these other books that don’t fit traditional definitions of fantasy (wizards, elves, and dragons) or science fiction (robots, machines, and space ships)? The solution has been an umbrella term: speculative fiction, or spec fic for short. Spec fic encompasses fantasy and sci-fi, but it also includes horror, dystopian and utopian fiction, apocalyptic and post-apocalyptic, alternate histories, supernatural tales, even superhero fiction … basically, anything that speculates on the apparently improbable or seemingly impossible.
The term “spec fic” isn’t an attempt to rename the old fantasy/sci-fi section. It is, rather, a way to gather all the loose clusters of related genres under one convenient term. And you’ll find all of the above-named genres published at Musa under the Urania imprint (with the exception of horror, which is handled by Thalia, our paranormal line).
So don’t be embarrassed if you don’t know what spec fic is. Writers still tend to think of themselves as working in a particular genre, and those genres still hold. It’s simply a more expansive, more inclusive term."
COMMENTS

If you haven't read an issue of Penumbra this is your lucky day. To celebrate 1 year we are giving everyone who comments here a copy of the 1st issue just tell us what format you would like it and the email address to send it to. Also when you comment here you are also entered again to win the Kindle Fire and swag bags.
Tuesday, 28 August 2012
A Speculative Sense of Wonder
by Miriah Hetherington
Writing speculative fiction has influenced the way I read stories and changed the way I look at the world. In the same way I suppose a software designer can’t play a video game without appreciating the effort that went into developing it, or a chef can’t eat a meal without noticing the ingredients and considering what makes the recipe delicious.
I’ve learned that creating a story is different from consuming a story. Kind of like the difference between the compulsion to open every wardrobe door you see, and the drive to figure out exactly how to build a wardrobe from the wood of a magic apple tree.
Recently, I decided it was time to box up my children’s collection of picture books. My twins are entering middle school and a rapidly growing collection of chapter books and YA novels are stacked precariously next to, instead of inside, their full bookshelves like misshapen Lego bricks. Not that piles of books are an unusual sight around my house.
The initial organizational plan was to sort through them, keep my favorites, keep my children’s favorites, and donate the rest. Yeah, right. This task is so much more difficult than tossing out and donating the clothes my children have outgrown. Our so-called children’s books still fit.
Have you ever noticed how many picture books contain strong elements of speculative fiction? What would you draw with a magic purple crayon? How cool would it be to travel in a giant peach with insect friends as big as you? When the Cat in the Hat shows up, crazy wild terrifying and wonderful things will start to happen. He reminds me of Doctor Who.
I love short fiction that makes me think, that opens my mind and twists my understanding. I think the best speculative fiction also appeals to the child in us. We want to suspend our disbelief and remember that sense of wonder. We want to experience alternate realities. We want the thrill of being frightened by a scary story, because you’re never too old to sleep with the lights on.
The seed of my Dream Catcher story germinated in my head one night when I was putting my twins to bed. I foolishly caved to their desire to watch something scary on TV, and my penance included a good half-hour spent positioning and repositioning a dreamcatcher to my daughter’s satisfaction, directly over her pillow. She also asked me to repeat the familiar dreamcatcher legend several times. I complied with as much conviction as I could muster, hoping the power of suggestion would be enough to help her succumb to sleep. As I waited for her to slip into that angelic state, I thought about her questions. If the dreamcatcher worked, then what really happened to the bad dreams? Surely nightmares hold too much power and energy to simply melt away in the light of day. In fairy tales, dreams hold revelation, and no blessing comes without a price.
Reading and writing speculative fiction challenges me to move my point of view around until I see beyond what is in front of me. Can you see them? The fey folk that linger in your peripheral vision, but on direct inspection look like teenagers skateboarding in the park. You know as well as I do the bicycle-mounted police officer is wearing shiny plate armor and riding a white horse in an alternate reality.
So move your point of view around until you can see the speculative possibilities. Then write about them so other people can open the wardrobe door and see them, too.
Miriah Hetherington is a middle-aged stay-home mom residing in the beautiful Pacific Northwest with her husband and three daughters. Though she’s been reading speculative fiction stories for years, it wasn’t until relatively recently that she started to write them herself. Miriah is delighted that her very first published story, Dream Catcher, will appear in Penumbra’s September 2012 Native American issue.
Learn more about Miriah Hetherington on her website. Stay connected on Facebook and Twitter.
Writing speculative fiction has influenced the way I read stories and changed the way I look at the world. In the same way I suppose a software designer can’t play a video game without appreciating the effort that went into developing it, or a chef can’t eat a meal without noticing the ingredients and considering what makes the recipe delicious.
I’ve learned that creating a story is different from consuming a story. Kind of like the difference between the compulsion to open every wardrobe door you see, and the drive to figure out exactly how to build a wardrobe from the wood of a magic apple tree.
Recently, I decided it was time to box up my children’s collection of picture books. My twins are entering middle school and a rapidly growing collection of chapter books and YA novels are stacked precariously next to, instead of inside, their full bookshelves like misshapen Lego bricks. Not that piles of books are an unusual sight around my house.
The initial organizational plan was to sort through them, keep my favorites, keep my children’s favorites, and donate the rest. Yeah, right. This task is so much more difficult than tossing out and donating the clothes my children have outgrown. Our so-called children’s books still fit.
Have you ever noticed how many picture books contain strong elements of speculative fiction? What would you draw with a magic purple crayon? How cool would it be to travel in a giant peach with insect friends as big as you? When the Cat in the Hat shows up, crazy wild terrifying and wonderful things will start to happen. He reminds me of Doctor Who.
I love short fiction that makes me think, that opens my mind and twists my understanding. I think the best speculative fiction also appeals to the child in us. We want to suspend our disbelief and remember that sense of wonder. We want to experience alternate realities. We want the thrill of being frightened by a scary story, because you’re never too old to sleep with the lights on.
The seed of my Dream Catcher story germinated in my head one night when I was putting my twins to bed. I foolishly caved to their desire to watch something scary on TV, and my penance included a good half-hour spent positioning and repositioning a dreamcatcher to my daughter’s satisfaction, directly over her pillow. She also asked me to repeat the familiar dreamcatcher legend several times. I complied with as much conviction as I could muster, hoping the power of suggestion would be enough to help her succumb to sleep. As I waited for her to slip into that angelic state, I thought about her questions. If the dreamcatcher worked, then what really happened to the bad dreams? Surely nightmares hold too much power and energy to simply melt away in the light of day. In fairy tales, dreams hold revelation, and no blessing comes without a price.
Reading and writing speculative fiction challenges me to move my point of view around until I see beyond what is in front of me. Can you see them? The fey folk that linger in your peripheral vision, but on direct inspection look like teenagers skateboarding in the park. You know as well as I do the bicycle-mounted police officer is wearing shiny plate armor and riding a white horse in an alternate reality.
So move your point of view around until you can see the speculative possibilities. Then write about them so other people can open the wardrobe door and see them, too.
Miriah Hetherington is a middle-aged stay-home mom residing in the beautiful Pacific Northwest with her husband and three daughters. Though she’s been reading speculative fiction stories for years, it wasn’t until relatively recently that she started to write them herself. Miriah is delighted that her very first published story, Dream Catcher, will appear in Penumbra’s September 2012 Native American issue.
Learn more about Miriah Hetherington on her website. Stay connected on Facebook and Twitter.
Thursday, 23 August 2012
The Difference Between Words and Worlds is a Letter
Metaphor and the Literal in Speculative Fiction
by Richard Baldwin
I started as a poet and - though I had always wanted to be a fantasy writer - for the life of me I couldn't find a way to write even a half-decent short story. I tried everything I could think of. I would free write for hours to try to get a story out. I would brainstorm like crazy. I would outline meticulously. Nothing worked.
The problem was two-fold: Everything I wrote wanted to be shorter and more dense than any stories I'd ever read (I'd never heard of flash fiction), and all the weight of whatever I'd write ended up being wrapped up in the metaphors.
Today much of what I write is still shorter, denser, and more wrapped in metaphor than a fair few authors, but when I set words to page now I can get a story out of them these days.
What changed? Eventually I decided that if I couldn't write short stories I could at least write longer poems. The longer the poems ran, the less they relied on one single image or metaphor to coalesce their meaning - they'd rely on two metaphors instead, say, or maybe three, and eventually they ran long enough that they didn't rely on metaphor and related language to keep up momentum, they instead relied on their plot.
I never stopped loving metaphor, though. Plot gets the story from its beginning to its end, but without some resonance a story is just literally a means to an end without any real meaning.
Now, I understand some speculative fiction audiences aren't big fans of metaphor. Metaphor is a complex subject in speculative fiction because our form of fiction is often written to be taken literally, and when audiences read it they expect the words to mean (until demonstrated otherwise) exactly what they say.
There's not a lot of space for figurative language when you must speak literally, so a lot of the oldest science fiction eschewed metaphor entirely. Since the New Wave it's been much easier to tell a story with figurative elements, but still the first thing we writers generally have to do is find a way to convey literally the context of the story, only after which it becomes clear to an sf/f audience what is metaphor and what is a literal explanation of some new phenomena the characters (and, through them, the audience members) are only just discovering.
Is there a way to go further, though? To use metaphor in a way that takes advantage of the nature of speculative fiction itself, to write in metaphors endowed with meanings that could never show up in any other form of fiction.
I believe so, yes. The trick is to find a way to convince audiences to read a statement two ways at once.
A literary or mainstream fiction audience reads metaphors as figurative: The trees move as if dancing when the author says, "the trees dance". A speculative audience, on the other hand, reads metaphors as literal unless demonstrated otherwise and in advance: The trees are literally dancing unless it's obvious from provided context that the trees couldn't do that.
On rare occasions, once the audience is set up for it, however, it is possible to use a metaphor that is both figurative *and* literal. In just the right story, the trees might literally dance while they also appear figuratively to be dancing (with all the resonance that the idea of dancing within the given context might suggest).
This is a difficult maneuver to manage, and it can distance the audience from the story; metaphor requires a form of associative thought that naturally disjoints one from the moment of the tale into a comparison to something, usually something outside the action. But, if it's perfectly handled, the apt literal image that also serves as a metaphor can resonate in ways that few moments in stories otherwise might ever manage. Moments like that, I would argue, are about as close as fiction can ever get to being poetry.
A more common form of metaphor in speculative fiction, however, involves subtext. An example: "The door dilated." While this isn't metaphorical in the sense that it gives us a figurative understanding of something that leads to a deeper understanding, it nonetheless contains its own resonating levels - just more literal ones than are available in other forms of fiction. We know the society that makes a dilating door must be one in which a door can dilate, and also one that has or had some use for a door to dilate. This suggests space age technology and a need to keep doors sealed, which suggests the story is in space (though of course we'd need a bit more context to be absolutely sure about any of this). As readers we can learn a great deal about a culture from a well chosen moment that carries within its subtext cultural implications that the statement pertains to. What is such a resonant statement, besides a metaphor?
Though I no longer focus on poetry, I don't just like metaphor, I don't just love it, but instead I feel it is absolutely crucial to good fiction. I don't feel this way, however, merely because finding depth and resonance in language is one of the great pleasures of fiction. No - metaphor matters to me by the very fact that we can discern great depth from simple words. Metaphors in all of their forms demonstrate, more fully than in any other literary technique that I've ever seen, the wonder inherent in the human ability to communicate with each other - to communicate at all. Is there anything more incredible than the ability for us to connect and share feelings through systems of shaped marks and noises?
One of the great things about speculative fiction is that it has so many different options for conveying metaphor that just aren't possible in any other medium. Nowhere else can we see, demonstrated over and over again, such a concentrated display of how us humans can convey not only our feelings and emotions but entire worlds of experience to each other. That's bigger than poetry, there aren't words for how big that is.
Fortunately, it seems, the spaces between and behind the words can handle that job just fine on their own.
Richard Baldwin writes from a raw strange shore along the archipelago of fantasy, but he currently resides in Toronto. A graduate of Odyssey and Taos Toolbox, more of Richard’s fiction can be found in AE and the Cucurbital 2 anthology from Paper Golem Press. He is also a professional audiobook narrator - view his demos HERE.
by Richard Baldwin
I started as a poet and - though I had always wanted to be a fantasy writer - for the life of me I couldn't find a way to write even a half-decent short story. I tried everything I could think of. I would free write for hours to try to get a story out. I would brainstorm like crazy. I would outline meticulously. Nothing worked.
The problem was two-fold: Everything I wrote wanted to be shorter and more dense than any stories I'd ever read (I'd never heard of flash fiction), and all the weight of whatever I'd write ended up being wrapped up in the metaphors.
Today much of what I write is still shorter, denser, and more wrapped in metaphor than a fair few authors, but when I set words to page now I can get a story out of them these days.
What changed? Eventually I decided that if I couldn't write short stories I could at least write longer poems. The longer the poems ran, the less they relied on one single image or metaphor to coalesce their meaning - they'd rely on two metaphors instead, say, or maybe three, and eventually they ran long enough that they didn't rely on metaphor and related language to keep up momentum, they instead relied on their plot.
I never stopped loving metaphor, though. Plot gets the story from its beginning to its end, but without some resonance a story is just literally a means to an end without any real meaning.
Now, I understand some speculative fiction audiences aren't big fans of metaphor. Metaphor is a complex subject in speculative fiction because our form of fiction is often written to be taken literally, and when audiences read it they expect the words to mean (until demonstrated otherwise) exactly what they say.
There's not a lot of space for figurative language when you must speak literally, so a lot of the oldest science fiction eschewed metaphor entirely. Since the New Wave it's been much easier to tell a story with figurative elements, but still the first thing we writers generally have to do is find a way to convey literally the context of the story, only after which it becomes clear to an sf/f audience what is metaphor and what is a literal explanation of some new phenomena the characters (and, through them, the audience members) are only just discovering.
Is there a way to go further, though? To use metaphor in a way that takes advantage of the nature of speculative fiction itself, to write in metaphors endowed with meanings that could never show up in any other form of fiction.
I believe so, yes. The trick is to find a way to convince audiences to read a statement two ways at once.
A literary or mainstream fiction audience reads metaphors as figurative: The trees move as if dancing when the author says, "the trees dance". A speculative audience, on the other hand, reads metaphors as literal unless demonstrated otherwise and in advance: The trees are literally dancing unless it's obvious from provided context that the trees couldn't do that.
On rare occasions, once the audience is set up for it, however, it is possible to use a metaphor that is both figurative *and* literal. In just the right story, the trees might literally dance while they also appear figuratively to be dancing (with all the resonance that the idea of dancing within the given context might suggest).
This is a difficult maneuver to manage, and it can distance the audience from the story; metaphor requires a form of associative thought that naturally disjoints one from the moment of the tale into a comparison to something, usually something outside the action. But, if it's perfectly handled, the apt literal image that also serves as a metaphor can resonate in ways that few moments in stories otherwise might ever manage. Moments like that, I would argue, are about as close as fiction can ever get to being poetry.
A more common form of metaphor in speculative fiction, however, involves subtext. An example: "The door dilated." While this isn't metaphorical in the sense that it gives us a figurative understanding of something that leads to a deeper understanding, it nonetheless contains its own resonating levels - just more literal ones than are available in other forms of fiction. We know the society that makes a dilating door must be one in which a door can dilate, and also one that has or had some use for a door to dilate. This suggests space age technology and a need to keep doors sealed, which suggests the story is in space (though of course we'd need a bit more context to be absolutely sure about any of this). As readers we can learn a great deal about a culture from a well chosen moment that carries within its subtext cultural implications that the statement pertains to. What is such a resonant statement, besides a metaphor?
Though I no longer focus on poetry, I don't just like metaphor, I don't just love it, but instead I feel it is absolutely crucial to good fiction. I don't feel this way, however, merely because finding depth and resonance in language is one of the great pleasures of fiction. No - metaphor matters to me by the very fact that we can discern great depth from simple words. Metaphors in all of their forms demonstrate, more fully than in any other literary technique that I've ever seen, the wonder inherent in the human ability to communicate with each other - to communicate at all. Is there anything more incredible than the ability for us to connect and share feelings through systems of shaped marks and noises?
One of the great things about speculative fiction is that it has so many different options for conveying metaphor that just aren't possible in any other medium. Nowhere else can we see, demonstrated over and over again, such a concentrated display of how us humans can convey not only our feelings and emotions but entire worlds of experience to each other. That's bigger than poetry, there aren't words for how big that is.
Fortunately, it seems, the spaces between and behind the words can handle that job just fine on their own.
Richard Baldwin writes from a raw strange shore along the archipelago of fantasy, but he currently resides in Toronto. A graduate of Odyssey and Taos Toolbox, more of Richard’s fiction can be found in AE and the Cucurbital 2 anthology from Paper Golem Press. He is also a professional audiobook narrator - view his demos HERE.
Tuesday, 21 August 2012
The Things That Make Us Write—Muse or Music?
by Celina Summers
Usually, when I write something for Musa or Penumbra, I'm writing with my editor's hat on. Today is a little different; I have my writer's hat on. My agent and I joke about that in our emails—some are sent to Celina the Editor and others to Celina the Writer, and it's Celina the Writer who's here today.
I have a confession to make. I'm one of those writers who's inspired to write because of songs, plays, movies, and books. I don't need those stories; I need the way those stories and songs make me feel.
The first novel I ever wrote, a really horrid epic fantasy very much in the style (okay, fan fiction) of David Eddings, I wrote to the soundtrack of Return of the Jedi. One of the projects my agent is shopping now was written to Andrew Lloyd Webber's The Phantom of the Opera—but only a specific version of POTO, with a specific cast, and a specific and set lineup of songs that doesn't mirror the order in the show. Another of my current projects I am writing to Sheherazade by the nineteenth century Russian composer Rimsky-Korsakov. But then, for fight scenes (I like to kill stuff), I always use the same playlist and the same songs, highlighted by "Battle of the Heroes", composed by John Williams for Star Wars III: Revenge of the Sith.
So, yeah. I'm not ashamed to admit it. I have theme music for my books.
I'm not the only author to do this. In fact, I know quite a few authors who have theme songs or playlists they write to. I tend to prefer orchestral music without vocalists for most of my writing music. Phantom is the big exception to that, but after years of musical theater, I learned to block vocals from my mind. It's a defense mechanism if you get cast in three successive productions of The Sound of Music, believe me. But The Phantom of the Opera sparked an idea for me—not a riff of Phantom, mind you. But the play and its music inspired me to set my magical realism series in the world of professional American theater—a world I know very well. And why not? Phantom has plays within the play, and all the action of the plot takes place backstage. I've seen multiple productions of POTO, on Broadway with three different casts, the movie version with the best-looking deformed man in history (Gerard Butler—I would totally have picked your Phantom over Raoul! Totally.), and now the 25th anniversary London production DVD. Every time I have seen Phantom—and particularly as a member of the audience—I have left the theater in an uplifted kind of reluctance. I wanted the play to keep going. I wanted to know what happened next. I pictured my coloratura self in the lyric soprano lead and created new adventures in my head. The show, and particularly the music, made me want to create. On top of that, however, the music from Phantom ties me to a tragedy from my youth. A school friend of mine from the sixth grade on was killed in an accident, and at his viewing, the POTO songs Music of the Night and Journey to the Cemetery were played over and over.
So the music has a specific meaning to me, both with my history in the theatrical world and also with an event that even now, I look back upon in sorrow. Those emotions, those personal claims upon my history and psychology, are evoked by the music—and I use that to fuel my writing for certain projects or for certain types of scenes.
It's not just music, though. Occasionally, other things will strike a spark in my imagination. A passage from a letter written in the 1800s gave birth to an alternate history set in the Tudor era. A lighting direction from a new play festival a decade ago stuck in my head and birthed the Darkshifters of my dark fantasy series. If it weren't for a recurring nightmare, I'd never have been able to conceptualize a story based upon an evil Harlequin.
And Obi Wan Kenobi stating emphatically, "Only the Sith deal in absolutes" set off an entire satire based on a writer's lack of comprehension of absolutism that will probably never see the light of day.
What? A girl's got to make a living somehow. Sorry, Mr. Lucas—but the line was funny.
So why does inspiration work this way? Maybe some writers can sit down and say to themselves, "Today, I'm going to write a space opera about cats that fly space shuttles and shoot mouse-shaped asteroids out of the belt between Mars and Jupiter." I'm not one of them…although that sounds like a good idea for a YA. After a lifetime spent in the arts, I find my inspiration in the moods that art or literature or music create in me. I can put in my Les Miserables CD in and let the music from that show serve as an accompaniment to the story I "see" in my head—the story that unfolds like a movie in my mind's eye and graciously permits me to relate the characters and the plot in a Word document file that someday, after much revision, editing, and beta reading, might just become a book.
There's a reason why the Muses are the patronesses of the arts in Greek mythology. Their responsibilities encompass the arts as known to the Greeks, and whenever a writer puts pen to paper, we pay homage to the idea of the Muses—we credit them with inspiring our work. Our word 'music' is derived from the Muses—so for me, at least, it's an easy leap that wonderful music can motivate an author to create an equally wonderful story.
But then there's the down side. How many times have I heard a writer, frustrated and nearly desperate, waiting fruitlessly for the Muse to appear? How many times has a writer blamed the absence of the Muse for the silence of their pen, the stalling of their stories?
You can't wait for a mythical Greek goddess to show up in your office and open up the cupboard in your mind where your story is kept. Got some bad news for you—mythical means "doesn't exist", and the fact of the matter is that inspiration, regardless of how it's sparked, is internal. Music from Phantom doesn't make me write. The response that music evokes in me—that's what makes me write. The magic onstage during a production of the show make me leave the theater feeling like I, too, am magical—and that magic is released in the form of a story.
So the next time you're sitting at your computer, playing never-ending, mindless games of Spider Solitaire while you wait for the Muse to descend in a cloud of glitter and magic and lead you past the plot snag that's got you stymied, perhaps the answer isn't floating on Mt. Olympus. Perhaps the answer is in a song, a book, a film that makes you feel like a magical moment was created. Perhaps the answer is in the scene where Severus Snape finally reveals his heart and story to Harry Potter in a tear. Maybe, that last beat where Rhett Butler says, "Frankly, my dear, I don't give a damn" will evoke that creative response in you. Give yourself and your imagination time to relax in someone else's world—or words—creations that have always spurred that artistic synchronicity in your soul Because in the end, while the spark may be external, the fire that blazes in every writer is decidedly internal.
In other words, don't be afraid to search for it in places other than the wall over your desk.
Usually, when I write something for Musa or Penumbra, I'm writing with my editor's hat on. Today is a little different; I have my writer's hat on. My agent and I joke about that in our emails—some are sent to Celina the Editor and others to Celina the Writer, and it's Celina the Writer who's here today.
I have a confession to make. I'm one of those writers who's inspired to write because of songs, plays, movies, and books. I don't need those stories; I need the way those stories and songs make me feel.
The first novel I ever wrote, a really horrid epic fantasy very much in the style (okay, fan fiction) of David Eddings, I wrote to the soundtrack of Return of the Jedi. One of the projects my agent is shopping now was written to Andrew Lloyd Webber's The Phantom of the Opera—but only a specific version of POTO, with a specific cast, and a specific and set lineup of songs that doesn't mirror the order in the show. Another of my current projects I am writing to Sheherazade by the nineteenth century Russian composer Rimsky-Korsakov. But then, for fight scenes (I like to kill stuff), I always use the same playlist and the same songs, highlighted by "Battle of the Heroes", composed by John Williams for Star Wars III: Revenge of the Sith.
So, yeah. I'm not ashamed to admit it. I have theme music for my books.
I'm not the only author to do this. In fact, I know quite a few authors who have theme songs or playlists they write to. I tend to prefer orchestral music without vocalists for most of my writing music. Phantom is the big exception to that, but after years of musical theater, I learned to block vocals from my mind. It's a defense mechanism if you get cast in three successive productions of The Sound of Music, believe me. But The Phantom of the Opera sparked an idea for me—not a riff of Phantom, mind you. But the play and its music inspired me to set my magical realism series in the world of professional American theater—a world I know very well. And why not? Phantom has plays within the play, and all the action of the plot takes place backstage. I've seen multiple productions of POTO, on Broadway with three different casts, the movie version with the best-looking deformed man in history (Gerard Butler—I would totally have picked your Phantom over Raoul! Totally.), and now the 25th anniversary London production DVD. Every time I have seen Phantom—and particularly as a member of the audience—I have left the theater in an uplifted kind of reluctance. I wanted the play to keep going. I wanted to know what happened next. I pictured my coloratura self in the lyric soprano lead and created new adventures in my head. The show, and particularly the music, made me want to create. On top of that, however, the music from Phantom ties me to a tragedy from my youth. A school friend of mine from the sixth grade on was killed in an accident, and at his viewing, the POTO songs Music of the Night and Journey to the Cemetery were played over and over.
So the music has a specific meaning to me, both with my history in the theatrical world and also with an event that even now, I look back upon in sorrow. Those emotions, those personal claims upon my history and psychology, are evoked by the music—and I use that to fuel my writing for certain projects or for certain types of scenes.
It's not just music, though. Occasionally, other things will strike a spark in my imagination. A passage from a letter written in the 1800s gave birth to an alternate history set in the Tudor era. A lighting direction from a new play festival a decade ago stuck in my head and birthed the Darkshifters of my dark fantasy series. If it weren't for a recurring nightmare, I'd never have been able to conceptualize a story based upon an evil Harlequin.
And Obi Wan Kenobi stating emphatically, "Only the Sith deal in absolutes" set off an entire satire based on a writer's lack of comprehension of absolutism that will probably never see the light of day.
What? A girl's got to make a living somehow. Sorry, Mr. Lucas—but the line was funny.
So why does inspiration work this way? Maybe some writers can sit down and say to themselves, "Today, I'm going to write a space opera about cats that fly space shuttles and shoot mouse-shaped asteroids out of the belt between Mars and Jupiter." I'm not one of them…although that sounds like a good idea for a YA. After a lifetime spent in the arts, I find my inspiration in the moods that art or literature or music create in me. I can put in my Les Miserables CD in and let the music from that show serve as an accompaniment to the story I "see" in my head—the story that unfolds like a movie in my mind's eye and graciously permits me to relate the characters and the plot in a Word document file that someday, after much revision, editing, and beta reading, might just become a book.
There's a reason why the Muses are the patronesses of the arts in Greek mythology. Their responsibilities encompass the arts as known to the Greeks, and whenever a writer puts pen to paper, we pay homage to the idea of the Muses—we credit them with inspiring our work. Our word 'music' is derived from the Muses—so for me, at least, it's an easy leap that wonderful music can motivate an author to create an equally wonderful story.
But then there's the down side. How many times have I heard a writer, frustrated and nearly desperate, waiting fruitlessly for the Muse to appear? How many times has a writer blamed the absence of the Muse for the silence of their pen, the stalling of their stories?
You can't wait for a mythical Greek goddess to show up in your office and open up the cupboard in your mind where your story is kept. Got some bad news for you—mythical means "doesn't exist", and the fact of the matter is that inspiration, regardless of how it's sparked, is internal. Music from Phantom doesn't make me write. The response that music evokes in me—that's what makes me write. The magic onstage during a production of the show make me leave the theater feeling like I, too, am magical—and that magic is released in the form of a story.
So the next time you're sitting at your computer, playing never-ending, mindless games of Spider Solitaire while you wait for the Muse to descend in a cloud of glitter and magic and lead you past the plot snag that's got you stymied, perhaps the answer isn't floating on Mt. Olympus. Perhaps the answer is in a song, a book, a film that makes you feel like a magical moment was created. Perhaps the answer is in the scene where Severus Snape finally reveals his heart and story to Harry Potter in a tear. Maybe, that last beat where Rhett Butler says, "Frankly, my dear, I don't give a damn" will evoke that creative response in you. Give yourself and your imagination time to relax in someone else's world—or words—creations that have always spurred that artistic synchronicity in your soul Because in the end, while the spark may be external, the fire that blazes in every writer is decidedly internal.
In other words, don't be afraid to search for it in places other than the wall over your desk.
Tuesday, 7 August 2012
From the Editor's Desk
Comparison and Contrast
by Celina Summers
Over the last week, I've been glued to the television watching swimming. Once, every four years, Americans have enough interest in swimming to actually televise it. It's funny—so many people speak so knowledgeably about the sport when you know full and darn well they don't have a clue about what it takes to be an Olympic medal swimmer. I was a mediocre swimmer at best, and I spent 3-4 hours a day every day working out in the pool, running, or lifting weights. So I find it a little funny to hear people say, "Well, Michael Phelps looked really tight in the semi of the 100 fly last night."
Looked really tight? The man is six foot four inches, one hundred and ninety-four pounds, and has an arm span of over six and a half feet with abs you could slice ham on and legs taller than anyone who competed in gymnastics. I think it's anatomically impossible for a guy who put the lank in lanky to ever look tight.
That being said—
Right now, across the world tens of thousands of people like myself who swam competitively in their youth but gave it up are shaking their heads. Michael Phelps has been to—and won gold at—three Olympics. That's twelve years of international caliber swimming. It doesn't even count the years before that and how hard he worked to even get to that level. Hours upon hours of work seven days a week, fifty-two weeks a year, since the twentieth century. He didn't just wake up one day as the greatest swimmer who's ever lived. Nope, he worked for years to gain that status and earned every ounce of the eighteen gold and four silver Olympic medals that now hang around his neck.
So I always find it baffling that people think writing is easy.
You don't just wake up one day and write a bestseller. Writers spend a lot of long, lonely hours—sitting at their desks getting words down on paper, editing and revising, cutting and rewriting. We have to. I wish that the very first time I sat down and started to lay a story out on paper that it had been a perfect manuscript, that I landed the first agent I sent it to, sold it to the first publisher she sent it to, and sold out of the first printing before the book was released.
But that's not quite the way it worked out—for any writer that I'm aware of.
Just as an Olympic champion swimmer spends years upon years of his life in the water, swimming lap after lap, working on his stroke and kick, stretching his endurance to the longest possible moment, and gaining his top speed one thousandth of a second at a time—the writer must also work out intellectually, spending years upon years within their stories, consigning those stories to paper and reworking them until they are the best possible representation of their writing. You can't expect someone to jump into the pool for the first time at twenty-four and swim a world record time. Why, then, would you expect someone to write the next great American novel right out of the gate? Heck, for that matter, why would you expect your first draft to be the final draft?
Why expect gold right off the bat?
Writers' expectations should be more realistic. And just like a top athlete, achievement comes after you've established the daily repetition of exercise—word counts or scene goals, a set amount of work completed day in and day out with gradually increasing goal expectations. Sometimes, life conspires so you can just jump right in. In my writing life, for example, I started off as a full time writer because of an accident that kept me from working. Those long days after that accident, I sat alone in our apartment for eighteen hours a day while my husband worked two jobs to keep our heads above water—no internet, no cable television, not even a telephone to break up the monotony. Every morning, I woke and climbed into my recliner, powered up the computer, and wrote. I rarely went out, even more rarely found some other way to engage my mind. All I had was my story, and I steeped myself in that world. I cranked out six 150,000 word first drafts in three months.
And I look back at those first drafts and cringe.
Writing is a tough business. Whether you write epic or flash, you must be trained for success by constantly working to refine and improve your craft. And just like Michael Phelps has his coach, Bob Bowman, the author has her coach—her editor. Bob Bowman helped Phelps to trim seconds off his time; an editor helps a writer to trim the unnecessary and tighten up her manuscript. You may hate working with your editor at the time—God knows I've yelled at the computer screen a lot during edits—but the end result of that work makes you glad you did it.
See, the whole purpose of training, whether you're an athlete or a writer, is to make the very difficult look very easy. As writers, we're surrounded by tons of people in real life who confide, "I plan to write a book some day"—like it's an easy thing to do…like just anyone can do it. (Unfortunately, we editors rarely escape that person at the party, who then proceeds to pitch their story to us and talk confidently about how much money they intend to make. It's a conversation that never ends well.) But writing isn't easy. Writing is hard. Writing takes training and patience, meticulous attention to detail and the dedication to sit down at the computer every single day. Athletes like Michael Phelps have a big advantage, too. Phelps started swimming competitively at age seven. Writers, on the other hand, write competitively much later in life. Sure—I have trunk novels from when I was in my late teens, but I'll burn them before I let someone read them now.
So while we all sit back in admiration as the greatest Olympian and swimmer of all time finally hangs up his goggles, stop and think for a minute of writing as a sport. Sit down and set your goals, then determine the training you'll need to meet those goals. Take the guidance of your coach/editor, and use that knowledge to improve your work. And while you'll never get that national anthem moment on the podium, with the dedication and drive every successful writer needs you might get that quiet moment in the middle of the night when a new review comes out of one of your stories and you feel the triumph of a job well done.
And until Bravo comes up with a writing reality show (and I would so audition for it, by the way), that's the medal ceremony for people like us. Unless, of course, you play the Star Spangled banner every time you finish a story.
Kind of cheesy, but hey—if it works, it works. I'm not going to judge you for it.
by Celina Summers
Over the last week, I've been glued to the television watching swimming. Once, every four years, Americans have enough interest in swimming to actually televise it. It's funny—so many people speak so knowledgeably about the sport when you know full and darn well they don't have a clue about what it takes to be an Olympic medal swimmer. I was a mediocre swimmer at best, and I spent 3-4 hours a day every day working out in the pool, running, or lifting weights. So I find it a little funny to hear people say, "Well, Michael Phelps looked really tight in the semi of the 100 fly last night."
Looked really tight? The man is six foot four inches, one hundred and ninety-four pounds, and has an arm span of over six and a half feet with abs you could slice ham on and legs taller than anyone who competed in gymnastics. I think it's anatomically impossible for a guy who put the lank in lanky to ever look tight.
That being said—
Right now, across the world tens of thousands of people like myself who swam competitively in their youth but gave it up are shaking their heads. Michael Phelps has been to—and won gold at—three Olympics. That's twelve years of international caliber swimming. It doesn't even count the years before that and how hard he worked to even get to that level. Hours upon hours of work seven days a week, fifty-two weeks a year, since the twentieth century. He didn't just wake up one day as the greatest swimmer who's ever lived. Nope, he worked for years to gain that status and earned every ounce of the eighteen gold and four silver Olympic medals that now hang around his neck.
So I always find it baffling that people think writing is easy.
You don't just wake up one day and write a bestseller. Writers spend a lot of long, lonely hours—sitting at their desks getting words down on paper, editing and revising, cutting and rewriting. We have to. I wish that the very first time I sat down and started to lay a story out on paper that it had been a perfect manuscript, that I landed the first agent I sent it to, sold it to the first publisher she sent it to, and sold out of the first printing before the book was released.
But that's not quite the way it worked out—for any writer that I'm aware of.
Just as an Olympic champion swimmer spends years upon years of his life in the water, swimming lap after lap, working on his stroke and kick, stretching his endurance to the longest possible moment, and gaining his top speed one thousandth of a second at a time—the writer must also work out intellectually, spending years upon years within their stories, consigning those stories to paper and reworking them until they are the best possible representation of their writing. You can't expect someone to jump into the pool for the first time at twenty-four and swim a world record time. Why, then, would you expect someone to write the next great American novel right out of the gate? Heck, for that matter, why would you expect your first draft to be the final draft?
Why expect gold right off the bat?
Writers' expectations should be more realistic. And just like a top athlete, achievement comes after you've established the daily repetition of exercise—word counts or scene goals, a set amount of work completed day in and day out with gradually increasing goal expectations. Sometimes, life conspires so you can just jump right in. In my writing life, for example, I started off as a full time writer because of an accident that kept me from working. Those long days after that accident, I sat alone in our apartment for eighteen hours a day while my husband worked two jobs to keep our heads above water—no internet, no cable television, not even a telephone to break up the monotony. Every morning, I woke and climbed into my recliner, powered up the computer, and wrote. I rarely went out, even more rarely found some other way to engage my mind. All I had was my story, and I steeped myself in that world. I cranked out six 150,000 word first drafts in three months.
And I look back at those first drafts and cringe.
Writing is a tough business. Whether you write epic or flash, you must be trained for success by constantly working to refine and improve your craft. And just like Michael Phelps has his coach, Bob Bowman, the author has her coach—her editor. Bob Bowman helped Phelps to trim seconds off his time; an editor helps a writer to trim the unnecessary and tighten up her manuscript. You may hate working with your editor at the time—God knows I've yelled at the computer screen a lot during edits—but the end result of that work makes you glad you did it.
See, the whole purpose of training, whether you're an athlete or a writer, is to make the very difficult look very easy. As writers, we're surrounded by tons of people in real life who confide, "I plan to write a book some day"—like it's an easy thing to do…like just anyone can do it. (Unfortunately, we editors rarely escape that person at the party, who then proceeds to pitch their story to us and talk confidently about how much money they intend to make. It's a conversation that never ends well.) But writing isn't easy. Writing is hard. Writing takes training and patience, meticulous attention to detail and the dedication to sit down at the computer every single day. Athletes like Michael Phelps have a big advantage, too. Phelps started swimming competitively at age seven. Writers, on the other hand, write competitively much later in life. Sure—I have trunk novels from when I was in my late teens, but I'll burn them before I let someone read them now.
So while we all sit back in admiration as the greatest Olympian and swimmer of all time finally hangs up his goggles, stop and think for a minute of writing as a sport. Sit down and set your goals, then determine the training you'll need to meet those goals. Take the guidance of your coach/editor, and use that knowledge to improve your work. And while you'll never get that national anthem moment on the podium, with the dedication and drive every successful writer needs you might get that quiet moment in the middle of the night when a new review comes out of one of your stories and you feel the triumph of a job well done.
And until Bravo comes up with a writing reality show (and I would so audition for it, by the way), that's the medal ceremony for people like us. Unless, of course, you play the Star Spangled banner every time you finish a story.
Kind of cheesy, but hey—if it works, it works. I'm not going to judge you for it.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)





